by Gary Meyer
(03/07/01)
You know what they say: if it's about sex with ostrich feathers,
it's erotica; if it's about sex with the whole ostrich, it's porn. Or
it depends on whether it's supposed to get you off. Like we're gonna ask
some dead writer what the deal was. "Hey, Henry Miller, that Trollop of
Capricorn stuff -- was that art, or were you just trying to give us boners?" Human
divining rod and Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart wimped out
trying to define porn, but he claimed, "I know it when I see it." Great. All
we gotta do is dig him up and our troubles are over.
Or you gotta go back to the ancient Greeks. Sure, the archer formerly
known as Eros was running around back then, and there was this pornographos
thing that was like the People Magazine of its time, with life stories of
famous courtesans, cause they didn't have J.Lo and Nicole and Mena, but
pornographos wasn't even necessarily dirty. Not till the 1860's did the
English word pornography come forth, because people really dug the Pornographic
Collection at the National Museum of Naples, which had stuff like a
marble statue of the god Pan making it with a she-goat. Bam! Right into
Webster's 1864 edition: "Pornography: licentious painting employed to decorate
the walls of rooms sacred to bacchanalian orgies."

It was the Victorians who got so uptight about all the X-rated books
jumping out of the wainscoting, pulling knives, and demanding, "Read me!" that
they decided to call them pornography meaning "the writing of
prostitutes," the lowest sexual outcasts they could think of. They blamed all those
books they didn't read -- in 1834, there were 57 porn shops on London's
Holywell Street alone -- on all the harlots they never hired, and called it a job well
done.
So erotica is this chubby cherub zapping you with an arrow dipped in
love potion, and pornography is a prostitute lapping at your lower parts in
a literary fashion. What's so awful about writing that's trying to
make your blood flow south, anyway? If a cookbook makes you hungry, it's a
great cookbook. If writing about sex doesn't make you feel it in your fun
zone, you call that writing? Nobody complains about Stephen King trying to
scare you shitless, or Dave Barry trying to crack you up.
You can read King and Barry anywhere. You can even shudder or
chortle in public. But try whipping out Lady Chatterly's Lover in the
waiting room.
And that Fanny Hill, just
try reading that out loud at a PTA meeting: Thus we spent the whole
afternoon, till supper-time, in a continued circle of love delights, kissing,
turtle-billing, toying, and all the rest of the feast! Turtle-billing. Whoo-hoo! Animals again.
Or people say it's porn and not erotica if it gets you off, dear reader,
regardless of the author's assumed intent -- the peter-meter, the
wet test; porn is in the groin of the beholder. Remember the movie Clockwork
Orange, the part where Malcolm MacDowell is in the prison library grooving on
Biblical verses about orgies and whipping slaves? If the Bible * gets
you hot, is it porn? What if you get hot and I don't? Then which is it,
porn or erotica? W.H. Auden had this hypothetical solution where twelve
"normal" guys read a book, and if a majority of them spring stiffies, it's
porn.
Nowadays you have to work in Canadian Customs to get a job like that.
I am a connoisseur of erotica myself, but, let's face it, if you
read something to get off, you're a porn user. The fear is that all
these guys with a severe depletion of cranial blood flow are going to run out and
assault women, children, and the larger house pets, rather than stay
indoors and assault wastebaskets with volleys of wadded tissue. And what
about hordes of hot, wet, porn-crazed women? Send 'em this way!
Maybe it's all in the words -- you know, Latino versus
Anglo-Saxophone. Do you osculate or kiss? Fornicate or fuck? Ejaculate or cum? Perform
fellatio or suck cock? Practice cunnilingus or muff dive? Now you know whether
you're an erotica collector, or a porn addict.
Maybe the difference between erotica and porn is the percentage of the
time the characters are naked and busy fitting various tabs A into sundry
slots B. We could impose a hard and fast limit, just like Mayor Giuliani does
in New York City with the porn shops: only forty percent of their merchandise
can be sex-oriented unless they want to be subject to zoning restrictions
that generously allow them to relocate next to a sewage treatment plant in
outer Queens.
Then there's the literary merit approach, as if we could ever agree
on what that means. Porn is despised
because it's poorly written, because porn writers have to pound it out
because porn publishers pay peanuts because they can't market it or distribute it
effectively because it's despised.
Time for some quotes from imaginary people:
Felicia Corning (linguist): "Erotica is apologetic; porn
is pejorative."
Oscar Wired (cyber Goth): "Erotica is the porn that dares not speak
its name."
Carla Climatize (meteorologist): "Erotica is dry; porn is wet."
Needless Sequel (film student): "Blow me! In this whole freaking
editorial, you're not once gonna mention the money shot, the cum gush, the
lovin' faceful, the pearl necklace, the jism jet, the spunk spasm?"
Percival Carruthers (freelance esthete): "Erotica is the tender
communion of
two souls embracing in the mystical void, a feast of the five
senses where each moment must be savored. The sight of the beloved across the room
watching TV, the heady aroma of her hairspray, the sound of her gentle
remonstrances, the taste of a proffered cookie, the electric brushing
of her fingertips, these sublime sensations should be enough for any man. Or
so my girlfriend tells me."
Case in point: that popular destination for sticky-fingered web
snurfers, Clean Shorts. Removing our shoes to climb over the puppy pile, we
open the safe and pull out two tattered scraps of parchment:
1. "It's really not his fault that I am the way I am, that I fall to
my knees the instant he expresses a desire that I suck on his long, lean cock.
That I spread my pussy lips wide for him the second his gaze indicates his
intention to lick my always swollen clit."
2. "Imagine a dream world, if you can, one infused with a pale wash of
color, pastel shades. Now imagine the softest of sounds and the most
delicate of flavors, and a searing, sweating, intense heat. And now mix all that
up with the smooth and sexy haze of slow motion, so that every touch, every
sigh, seems to last an eternity."
It doesn't take an artistic license to figure out whether the above
passages are oral, anal, nasal, vaginal, or even erotic or
pornographic. So what's the booty of our investigative jugularism? Well, for an
erotica site, Clean Shorts has a definite propensity toward pornic blurbishment
(#1). But the weird thing is that both passages are from the very same story,
Intensely Evan by Katy Terrega. That's the thing about Clean Shorts, you can't put it in a box.
Maybe erotica versus porn is a false dicotyledon after all, like human
versus animal, or foreplay versus going for the O. Maybe there's room for
both. Maybe great writing about sex needs both. Maybe either one alone is
missing something. Eroticorn! Pornotica! It's a Brave Nude Whirl
and the breast is yet to come.